首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparative study of three neural network forecast combination methods for simulated river flows of different rainfall-runoff models
【2h】

A comparative study of three neural network forecast combination methods for simulated river flows of different rainfall-runoff models

机译:三种神经网络预报组合方法在不同降雨径流模型中模拟河流量的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The performance of three artificial neural network (NN) methods for combining simulated river flows, based on three different neural network structures, are compared. These network structures are; the simple neural network (SNN), the radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) and the multi-layer perceptron neural network (MLPNN). Daily data of eight catchments, located in different parts of the world, and having different hydrological and climatic conditions, are used to enable comparisons of the performances of these three methods. In the case of each catchment, each neural network combination method synchronously uses the simulated river flows of four rainfall-runoff models operating in design non-updating mode to produce the combined river flows. Two of these four models are black-box, the other two being conceptual models. The results of the study show that the performances of all three combination methods are, on average, better than that of the best individual rainfall-runoff model utilized in the combination, i.e. that the combination concept works. In terms of the Nash-Sutcliffe R2 model efficiency index, the MLPNN combination method generally performs better than the other two combination methods tested. For most of the catchments, the differences in the R2 values of the SNN and the RBFNN combination methods are not significant but, on average, the SNN form performs marginally better than the more complex RBFNN alternative. Based on the results obtained for the three NN combination methods, the use of the multi-layer perceptron neural network (MLPNN) is recommended as the appropriate NN form for use in the context of combining simulated river flows.
机译:比较了基于三种不同神经网络结构的三种人工神经网络(NN)方法对模拟河流流量进行组合的性能。这些网络结构是:简单神经网络(SNN),径向基函数神经网络(RBFNN)和多层感知器神经网络(MLPNN)。使用位于世界不同地区且具有不同水文和气候条件的八个流域的每日数据,可以比较这三种方法的性能。对于每个集水区,每种神经网络组合方法都同步使用在设计非更新模式下运行的四个降雨径流模型的模拟河流流量,以产生组合河流流量。这四个模型中有两个是黑匣子,另外两个是概念模型。研究结果表明,所有三种组合方法的性能平均都优于组合中使用的最佳个体降雨径流模型,即组合概念有效。就Nash-Sutcliffe R2模型效率指标而言,MLPNN组合方法的性能通常优于测试的其他两种组合方法。对于大多数集水区,SNN和RBFNN组合方法的R2值差异不明显,但平均而言,SNN形式比更复杂的RBFNN替代品略有改善。基于从三种NN组合方法获得的结果,建议使用多层感知器神经网络(MLPNN)作为在组合模拟河流量的背景下使用的适当NN形式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号